Compliant Paraplanning Services for UK adviser firms
AI governance

Responsible AI in paraplanning.

AI may improve efficiency, but client confidentiality, data protection, source checking, human judgement and adviser accountability still govern the work.

For UK adviser firmsReviewed 6 August 2026By Compliant Paraplanning Services
CPS position

Live client data will not be entered into a personal Microsoft 365/Copilot subscription or another consumer AI account. Any future use requires an approved business tenant and configuration, contractual and data-protection assessment, named-user controls, agreed use cases, firm approval and human checking before case work is relied upon.

A practical control sequence

  1. Define the use case. Record what the tool will do, what it will not do and whether personal data is necessary.
  2. Approve the service. Check the exact plan, tenant, contract, data location, retention, subprocessors, access controls and provider commitments.
  3. Assess the processing. Confirm roles, lawful basis, transparency, minimisation, security and whether a DPIA is required.
  4. Agree it with the firm. Put permitted use, restrictions, incidents, audit evidence and deletion into the engagement framework.
  5. Keep a human in control. Verify source facts, calculations, citations, suitability logic and every final output.
  6. Monitor. Review access, incidents, model or contract changes, error themes and continuing necessity.

What AI must not decide for CPS

AI does not establish suitability, approve a recommendation, replace missing evidence, infer client consent, make a Pension Transfer Specialist decision or sign off a regulated file. Efficiency is useful only inside the firm’s agreed advice and control framework.

Why the exact Microsoft plan matters

Microsoft documents enterprise data protection and tenant controls for eligible work accounts and Microsoft 365 Copilot services. Those protections are plan- and configuration-specific. A personal subscription is not the approved CPS case environment; business setup and documented testing must come first.

Current launch rule: no live client data may enter AI until the approved environment, contracts, assessment, access controls and adviser-firm terms are complete.

Frequently asked questions

Can live client data be entered into a personal Copilot or consumer AI account?

No under the CPS launch controls. Live client data must not enter a personal or consumer AI account; use requires an approved business environment, contractual coverage, documented assessment, access controls and firm agreement.

Does AI remove the need for human checking?

No. Source checking, calculation review, professional judgement and adviser approval remain necessary. AI output can be incomplete, inaccurate or inappropriate to the case.

What must be agreed with an adviser firm before AI is used?

The approved use cases, data types, system and tenant, subprocessors, retention, access, human checks, incident route and contractual responsibilities should be documented before live work.

Primary sources

This is an operating position and general guidance, not a vendor certification, legal opinion or firm-specific DPIA.